|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Abdiel Kavash
Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
|
Posted - 2010.09.13 01:28:00 -
[1]
Roughly in the order of personal importance:
Access control: - Personal divisions in the CHAs / SMAs. - Hangar tabs in SMAs. - Access control based on individual structures, or at least towers. Currently, when I want a person to be able to offline silos at one reaction POS, I also have to give him privilegies to unanchor every other POS we control. - Allow forcefield access and using structures (CHA, SMA, JB, cynogens...) based on standings. - Allow access to labs, arrays, etc. to alliance members (and also based on standings).
Improve anchoring interface: - Arrows should resize when zooming in/out (see: probing interface). - The box should not move when your ship moves. - There should be an easier way to finish the anchoring than right-clicking the arrows. - Allow locking the camera to the anchoring box. - Give a visual indication whether anchoring here is possible - i.e. not too close/too far away from the forcefield. Maybe turn the box red in invalid positions. - (potentially) draw a grid around the POS to aid in precise placement. - Anchoring / onlining queue.
UI improvements: - Move the Put Offline button away from Store Ships on a SMA (and similar with other affected structures). - Give CEOs/Directors/players with necessary role a list of all the towers owned by the corporation and their locations (planet, moon). - Show a "Lasts For" timer on silos connected to a reaction. It should show the time the silo will empty (if input) or fill up (if output). - Clearly indicate on silos description which silo can store what. - Show the POS cycle timer somewhere. - Show the amount of ammo in POS guns somewhere (without having to fly to each individual gun).
Other: - Allow repackaging ships / items in a CHA/SMA. - Allow contracts originating from a CHA/SMA, maybe even courrier contracts with a CHA/SMA as the destination. - Make Refining Arrays and TII Ship Arrays do something useful. - Create a POS array to manufacture POS/Sov structures. - Small issue: You can anchor a TCU next to a POS, but not a POS next to a TCU. It should be either none or both. ___________ EVE is dying! Now for real! |

Abdiel Kavash
Caldari Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
|
Posted - 2010.09.19 08:08:00 -
[2]
Two pieces of low-hanging fruit:
- Allow naming of POS structures. The button is already there, it just does nothing. - In the fuel screen, show 0 for usage of the items the tower doesn't use (charters!). Or don't even show them at all. ___________ EVE is dying! Now for real! |

Abdiel Kavash
Caldari Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
|
Posted - 2010.09.23 20:07:00 -
[3]
An idea that has been repeatedly proposed elsewhere but not in this thread as far as I see - allow multiple people to anchor/online modules at a POS at the same time. Reduce the time needed to set up a POS, it's not as complicated to implement as a queue, and most of all, promotes teamwork. ___________ EVE is dying! Now for real! |

Abdiel Kavash
Caldari Paladin Order Fidelas Constans
|
Posted - 2010.09.25 14:22:00 -
[4]
Edited by: Abdiel Kavash on 25/09/2010 14:23:19 Edited by: Abdiel Kavash on 25/09/2010 14:22:19 Another thing that should be easy to implement: On the Processes > Production screen (where you see moon reactions), create an indicator that says "Everything linked properly" or "Reactor output not linked". With the linking interface as it is (it could use a redesign TBH, but that's way more work), this is sometimes not so easy to tell when you are running multiple reactions and mining from the same POS. ___________ EVE is dying! Now for real! |
|
|
|